Deepwater/Subsea Technology: Harnessing tie-back engineering techniques to accelerate production
The oil and gas industry is facing pressure to find efficient and commercially viable paths to new production amidst the perfect storm of an energy security crisis, surging inflation and a challenging investment climate for fossil fuels. The rapid expansion of renewable energy is good news, but fossil fuels are still required in the medium-to-short term, which is creating an energy boom cycle.
The UK government, therefore, wants to accelerate production of the North Sea’s offshore wind, as well as the estimated 4.4 Bbbl of remaining oil and gas equivalent to fill the void created by Russian import sanctions. With banks also under pressure to stop investing in new fossil fuel projects, there is a growing financial imperative to improve project economics and produce faster return on investments.
The challenge. A major challenge is that the oil and gas industry remains wedded to a “waterfall” project management model, whereby every stage, from platform manufacturing to drilling, happens sequentially and in silos. For example, production drilling often doesn’t start until after a new platform has been built and installed, which can take years, Fig. 1.
But it wasn’t always this way. Processes have previously been substantially expedited by pre-drilling wells during the platform construction phase, which could then be later tied back to the platform, enabling them to be put onto production within days after the platform is installed. This was a common practice but has fallen out of favor in recent years, with very few projects taking this approach.
Why has it fallen out of favor? This tie-back approach has been overlooked, due to the advent and availability of cheap money, reducing the necessity for a speedy return on investment. This, combined with a lack of expertise and increasingly siloed oil and gas organizational departments, has likely decreased the appetite to expedite tie-back projects. Project risks have also increased in recent years, with several examples of pre-drilled wells never being successfully tied back and put into production, due to technical issues, such as tolerance build-up and a lack of tie-back engineering continuity throughout a project’s lifecycle.
The negative impact of suppliers and organizational departments expertly delivering their own elements of a project in isolation should not be underestimated. Without a tie-back engineering function providing continuity and making balanced concessions between seemingly unrelated stakeholders, the project runs the risk of failure being baked into the design from the beginning.
Why tie-back? Tie-back engineering from past projects has demonstrated the ability to achieve faster and lower cost routes to first production by allowing development drilling and platform construction to happen concurrently. By utilizing specialist tie-back engineering expertise, production wells can be pre-drilled and suspended, all while the jacket and topsides are being built, Fig. 2. This means that production can begin days after installation, shaving months if not years off production timelines.
Drilling templates, docking piles, pre-drilling and suspending production wells all enable multiple wells to be pre-drilled and lower completions to be installed. This can be done whilst detailed design and the manufacturing of the jacket and platform are being completed.
For this process to be successful, it requires all interfaces and design tolerances across different equipment vendors to be balanced at concept stage through to installation. This will ensure optimal interoperability, design and alignment for production well tie-back. A neutral convener with tie-back engineering expertise can form a connecting thread, uniting a diverse and disparate supply chain for optimum efficiency.
Project management specialists can oversee collaboration and compromise among separate suppliers and organizational departments. Seemingly minor design, manufacturing or installation tolerances can have a massive effect on the tie-back ability of the project, but by communicating, measuring and managing success through the optic of tie-back ability, disparate stakeholders can be pulled together with a common cause. If issues arise, such as a missed installation tolerance, other elements of the project can then be assessed, where they may have already improved a tolerance or be able to make future adjustments to ensure that overall, the project remains in alignment. This makes sure that a successful tie-back is incorporated into designs at concept phase, enabling companies to move from a slow and sequential model of production, toward simultaneous pre-drilling and platform construction.
As an example, at Aquaterra Energy, we supported a major energy company to pre-drill, suspend and tie back six wells while the jacket and topside were still under construction. This enabled the operator to start production within days of the platform being installed. Our early-stage, collaborative approach accelerated first oil, and therefore improved the return-on-investment performance, making the project economically viable.
Toward collaborative and concurrent production. At the root of all these innovations is the need to move from siloed and sequential production methods toward collaborative and concurrent production. If the oil and gas industry adopts a system engineering approach, where every component is cohesively designed and aligned for collective tie-back at concept phase through to installation, then production will be achieved under greatly expedited timelines, with project risk significantly reduced. This would allow the industry to move beyond a linear model, where platforms and wells are created separately in sequence, toward a model where platform construction, pre-drilling and tie-back happen concurrently. Adoption of this model could remove several years off average production timelines.
Amidst an energy security crisis and an increasingly challenging investment climate for fossil fuels, there are growing financial and political imperatives for earlier and more cost-efficient routes to new production. Tie-back engineering techniques offer the industry the opportunity to dramatically reduce cost and timelines.
Value-added potential. Yet this will require cross-sector collaboration among suppliers and project partners to align designs for tie-back at concept stage, with a competent tie-back engineering contractor providing the common thread throughout the project. This will enable the industry to move from sequential development stages toward simultaneous drilling and platform construction for accelerated drilling-to-production timelines. It has the potential to drive a sea-change in production efficiency and project economics that could help the industry weather the current financial pressures and meet political imperatives for earlier development of domestic energy resources.
- Driving MPD adoption with performance-enhancing technologies (January 2024)
- Digital transformation: A breakthrough year for digitalization in the offshore sector (January 2024)
- Offshore technology: Platform design: Is the next generation of offshore platforms changing offshore energy? (December 2023)
- 2024: A policy crossroads for American offshore energy (December 2023)
- Mixed outlook for activity on the UK Continental Shelf (December 2023)
- The last barrel (November 2023)
- Applying ultra-deep LWD resistivity technology successfully in a SAGD operation (May 2019)
- Adoption of wireless intelligent completions advances (May 2019)
- Majors double down as takeaway crunch eases (April 2019)
- What’s new in well logging and formation evaluation (April 2019)
- Qualification of a 20,000-psi subsea BOP: A collaborative approach (February 2019)
- ConocoPhillips’ Greg Leveille sees rapid trajectory of technical advancement continuing (February 2019)